coffee_beans.jpgIPNews® – A small New Hampshire-based coffee company won a major victory against big-time coffee maker Starbucks.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Starbucks had failed to show that its brand would be harmed by the smaller company’s “Charbucks” line of coffee products.  As such, it was denied the injunction it was

shaver.jpgIPNews® – A recent complaint filed by Beardo, Inc. seeks relief for alleged infringement of its bearded hat designs.

Beardo last week filed a patent infringement lawsuit against three competing companies, claiming that its design for a hat connected to a knitted beard had been copied.  While no formal response has been submitted by any

medical_instruments.jpgIPNews® – The TTAB recently ruled that BOTULEX is confusingly similar to BOTOX, which will prevent the BOTULEX trademark application from proceeding to registration.

The fight over younger looking skin has a winner as the makers of BOTOX successfully opposed a trademark application for BOTULEX, the brand name of similar skin rejuvenation products.  The victory

motorcycle-harley-body.jpgIPNews® –  Young Jeezy has been hit with a trademark infringement lawsuit from the Hells Angels for using a design in his clothing line that  is too similar to the motorcycle club’s well-known “death head” insignia.

Rapper Young Jeezy has picked a fight with the famous biker gang the Hells Angels, by allegedly copying the

p.jpgIPNews® – Last week Pinterest hit travel site Pintrips with a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit for being too similar its popular “pinning” application.

In the lawsuit, Pinterest seeks to shut down the startup travel website Pintrips for causing consumer confusion.   In support of its claim of infringement, Pinterest cites the similarity of the names and the

satellite-dish.jpgIPNews® – Dish Network has run into issues with use of its “Dish Anywhere” Trademark.

Dish Network’s biggest competitors filed oppositions in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to block its newly filed Trademark Application for “Dish Anywhere.”  The companies claimed that they would be damaged by if the application were allowed to proceed to