face.jpgIPNews® – A patent case against Toshiba America, Inc. was filed in Delaware Federal Court on July 2nd which claims that the company violated patents related to facial recognition technology.

CeeColor Industries, LLC alleges that Toshiba has violated the patents it holds for facial recognition technology by using the technology in Toshiba’s line of Qosmio

barrel.jpgIPNews® – Kraft Food Group, Inc. won a preliminary injunction in its trademark infringement case against Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. as a Federal Judge barred the company from selling any grocery products bearing the “Cracker Barrel” label in stores. 

Kraft’s lawsuit is still pending.  The case will ultimately decide if Cracker Barrel Old

monitor.jpgIPNews® – 7 major technology corporations got hit with a patent infringement lawsuit Friday involving technology for sleek computer screens.

Innovative Display Technologies, Inc. alleges that major companies including Dell, Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. violated its patents in development of new energy-efficient displays for computers and cell phones.  Innovative Display Technologies is seeking damages and

football.jpgIPNews® – Research Group Three Inc., a motorcycle products company, is challenging Washington Redskins quarterback Robert Lee Griffin III in his attempt to trademark his iconic nickname, RG3.

The conflict began after Griffin formed Thr3escompany LLC to develop RG3 branded apparel and filed for a trademark for RG3.  Research Group Three opposed the application, claiming

home-price.jpgIPNews® – The fight over a patent for online home appraisal systems continues between Zillow and Trulia as both spar in federal court.

Zillow originally filed its lawsuit against Trulia for patent infringement, claiming Trulia’s home valuation service resembled its own program too closely.  Trulia countered, arguing Zillow’s patent is merely for an abstract idea

birthday.jpgIPNews® – The copyright for “Happy Birthday to You” has come into contention recently, as a filmmaker filed a lawsuit in New York seeking to cancel the song’s copyright protection.

The debate stems over the copyright held by Warner/Chappell Music, originally obtained in 1935 for the piano composition still in use.  Opponents claim that the